top of page

Bayview’s Dark Decades

Editorial Assistant Izzah Adnan explores the mysterious disappearance of Lynette Dawson, the conviction of Chris Dawson for her murder, and the importance of achieving justice for the victims of domestic violence.

On January 9 1982, the tight-knit community of Bayview was thrust into chaos when Lynette Dawson, a beloved figure in her community, mysteriously disappeared. Her absence unleashed a torrent of whispers and lies that lingered over the Northern Beaches for four tumultuous decades.

In 2023, the nation's gaze focused on the resolution of one of Australia's most enduring mysteries; the disappearance and murder of Lynette Dawson. Former school teacher Chris Dawson, Lynette's husband, was found guilty of the crime [1], a verdict that culminated years of speculation and denial. Throughout the trial, Dawson maintained his innocence in the face of mounting circumstantial evidence, given the absence of Lynette's body.

The prosecution, despite lacking a direct link to the crime scene, argued persuasively that the circumstantial evidence was "extremely damning."[2] Central to their case was Dawson's infidelity with a teenage student named JC. His multiple proposals to JC, culminating in a marriage in 1984 without divorcing Lynette, painted a portrait of a complex and troubled relationship. [3] The podcast The Teacher's Pet played a pivotal role in unravelling additional evidence and witnesses, exposing Dawson's abusive behaviour towards Lynette, and shedding light on his questionable relationships with other teenage girls. [4]

Justice Ian Harrison, overseeing the trial at the New South Wales Supreme Court, delivered the long-awaited verdict. Dawson was found guilty of murdering Lynette Dawson on or about January 8, 1982. Dismissing Dawson's account of events, the judge condemned his actions as "callous, selfish, dishonest, and reprehensible." The life sentence without parole was deemed appropriate for what Justice Harrison described as a "rare" and "exceptional" case, justifying the gravity of the offence and the necessity for deterrence and retribution. [5]

The aftermath of the trial sent shockwaves through both the Dawson and Lynette families. Shanelle Dawson, the couple's eldest daughter, delivered a heart-wrenching victim impact statement, exposing the enduring trauma she endured. The verdict, while providing closure, brought forth mixed emotions as Shanelle grappled with the stark reality of losing both her mother and father. [6] Lynette's family and friends expressed relief, savouring the closure the verdict brought after four decades of anguish. Their collective hope now rests on Chris Dawson revealing the location of Lynette's remains for a proper and long-overdue burial. 

The trial also thrust into the spotlight the role of media, particularly podcasts like The Teacher's Pet, in investigating and reporting on unsolved crimes. Praised for its journalistic excellence, concerns surfaced about potential bias, sensationalism, and interference with the legal process, striking a delicate balance between public interest and ensuring a fair trial remains a persistent challenge in such high-profile cases. [7]

Additionally, the Dawson trial revealed the formidable challenges associated with prosecuting cold cases, particularly those relying on circumstantial evidence and lacking a body. Rigorous measures to ensure the accuracy and credibility of sources, safeguard privacy, and prevent undue media influence must be implemented to maintain the integrity of the legal process.

Lastly, the case shed light on the pervasive issue of domestic violence and abuse, urging society to confront the challenges victims face. The imperative to empower victims, hold abusers accountable and foster cultural change becomes all the more pressing in the quest to eliminate the tolerance of domestic violence. [8]

In the wake of Chris Dawson's conviction for the murder of Lynette Dawson, the profound impact on Bayview's community and the nation at large prompts a crucial reflection: how will this landmark case shape the discourse surrounding justice, media ethics, and the imperative to confront domestic violence in our society?

[1] Bucci, N. Five Reasons Chris Dawson Was Found Guilty of Murder, according to the Judgment. The Guardian, 30 Aug. 2022.

[2] McKinnell, J. How Was Chris Dawson Found Guilty of Murder without “a Skerrick” of Scientific or Forensic Evidence? ABC News, 2 Sept. 2022.

[3] Pryer, E. My Monster Dad Moved His Lover, 16, into Our Home and Then Murdered Mum. The Sun, 9 Nov. 2023,

[4] Samios, Z. Teacher’s Pet Journalist ‘Doubles Down’ on Cold Case Investigations after Dawson Trial. The Sydney Morning Herald, 31 Aug. 2022,

[5] Bucci, N. Five Reasons Chris Dawson Was Found Guilty of Murder, according to the Judgment. The Guardian, 30 Aug. 2022.

[6] Franks, R. “I Hope I’ve Honoured You Well”: Shanelle Dawson Reclaims Her Mother’s Story in One of Two New Books on Lyn Dawson. The Conversation, 15 Oct. 2023,

[7] Samios, Z. Teacher’s Pet Journalist ‘Doubles Down’ on Cold Case Investigations after Dawson Trial. The Sydney Morning Herald, 31 Aug. 2022,

[8] Badham, V. Justice and Progress for Women: The Chris Dawson Guilty Verdict Gives Australia Reasons to Hope. The Guardian, 30 Aug. 2022,


Los comentarios se han desactivado.
bottom of page